|  
  |  
 
  
My Information:
Blogger Name: joseph
Location: nd
Birthday: 10/27/1979
Sex: Male
Last blog: 07/21/2006

 
My Feeds:
Using an RSS reader? Want real-time updates from my blog? Go ahead and click on the XML button below and insert this blog into your reader! It’s that easy! (You can get a free RSS reader from Bloglines, just click here!)


 Add to My Yahoo!
 
Newest Blogs Uploaded:
 


Blog World Statistics:
RSGH Bloggers: 255
Blogs Uploaded: 985
Comments Made: 143985
 

dana? nada!

based on a Comment from: BilLanta [Member] about my previous post....

"So THAT's how that EDIT feature works...
Maybe I will go back and correct some of my speling mistaks.
I am curious (for real) what did you think of DANA
Apparently not "all" of us know *that* one. At least me anyway."

for some reason, the system didn't accept my long reply, and logged me out. so i'm blogging this one.

dana, as everyone from jason to josh (ha!) has probably mentioned, didn't belong on this show. ergo, i say she is not "the rock". i kind of figured that would be crushingly obvious. and it wasn't so much about not "bringing it"... she brung it as good as she could. her baba o'reilly was way better than something an established rock-chick like patrice could pull off. but nevertheless, i guess supernova had to choose between embarassing their project leader, or get rid of someone who had a long way to go, anyway. she had to go home, so it didn't really matter what week that was in.

let's face it. she's a good musician, but not really someone ready to make a porn vid. or fight napster. or whatever it is that made g'n'r notorius. she is not "the rock".

the producers have to choose the losers based on entertainment value (or lack thereof)... saccharine-sweet dana had less to bring to the show than intergalactic-planetary zayra.

she took it well, dana did. for a kid making her bones in the whole rock scene, she took crits a lot better than someone like jill, or patrice, or zayra.

enough rambling... basically, she was way too sweet for the show.

August 3, 2006, 3:48 pm. 1 commentPermalink


the rawwkkk??

i wish people would stop referring to it as "the rock" or "the rawwkk", or however else they may wish to spell it. where i come from, and where i've been for a good many years, we've always called it "rock". perhaps it's just me, but anytime i hear people talk about playing the rock, i get a flintstones flashback.

bring on the rock? leave that to vince mcmahon.

but, given america's obsession with the term, i'd like to tell you what "the rock" is not.

> lukas rossi: honestly... 80s glam meets emo meets goth meets street meets punk??? it wopuld help if you could actually sing. or growl. or anything besides smirk.

> patrice pike: half-sleeved tattoos: check. kick ass voice: check. appearance of someone recovering from paralysis therapy: umm...

> toby rand: all 4 one reject, for being too hard.

> josh logan: all 4 one reject, for being too soft.

> dana andrews: okay... we all know *that* one.

and that's it for now. in the next rant: joseph takes on the band.

August 3, 2006, 2:53 pm. 28 commentsPermalink
















 
All rights reserved. Use of this website assumes acceptance of the terms, rules and regulations herein.
All logos, pictures and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. This website has been
developed and presented by Rock Star Go Home and is not connected with Rock Star: The Series or Mark Burnett Productions.